A semi-truck driver in his 40’s was referred to Michael Yawney QC, after a vehicle collided head on with his tractor trailer unit on Hwy 97. The other driver was killed and the evidence suggested that he may have veered into the truck driver’s lane intentionally.
As a result of the collision, the truck driver suffered neck and back injuries, as well as post-traumatic stress disorder. Shortly before a scheduled trial date, Mr. Yawney was able to resolve the claim for over $500,000.00.
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png00NW Adminhttps://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.pngNW Admin2018-05-22 00:00:002018-05-22 00:00:00Tractor Trailer Accident Settles for over $500,000.00
A husband and wife from Dawson Creek, BC were visiting their family in Red Deer, Alberta when an inattentive motorist slammed into their pickup truck from behind. The couple were referred to Michael Yawney QC and he handled their claims, dealing with an Alberta insurer.
Because the accident happened in Alberta, the claim had to be prosecuted there. The injuries from the collision had impacted both of them and their family owned business. Mr. Yawney was able to resolve their claims after a full day mediation for $300,000.00.
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png00NW Adminhttps://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.pngNW Admin2018-05-17 00:00:002018-05-17 00:00:00Full Day Mediation in Alberta Settles for $300,000.00
Written by: Krystin Kempton, Associate
Most people think they have plenty of opportunities to write a will at some point in the future, but what if you don’t get the chance?
If you die without a will, it’s called dying “intestate”. Without a will, someone (usually a close family member) will have to apply to the court to be appointed administrator of the estate if probate is needed to release and distribute your assets. If you have minor children and the other parent is not alive, the court will also have to appoint a guardian.
Assets are distributed according to an established formula under the Wills, Estates and Succession Act.
If you die leaving:
a spouse and no children, your entire estate passes to your spouse;
a spouse and children, where your children are also the children of your spouse:
a. your spouse receives
i. the first $300,000; ii. ½ of the residue of your estate; iii. household furnishings; and iv. the right to acquire the spousal home (if it was not held jointly at the time of your death) to satisfy his or her spouse’s interest in the estate (i.e., $300,000 + ½ of the residue of the estate). If the value of the home exceeds your spouse’s share of the estate, your spouse may purchase the balance of the interest in the spousal home from the estate; and
b. your children receive ½ of the residue of your estate, in equal shares;
a spouse and children, where your children are not the children of your spouse, the distribution is the same as 2(a) above except your spouse will only receive the first $150,000, plus the balance of the items under 2(a)(ii) through (iv);
no spouse, but children and/or descendants, the estate passes equally among your children. If a child has died before you, their share passes equally to their children, if any;
no spouse and no children, the estate passes equally to your parents or your surviving parent; or
no spouse, no children and no parents, the estate passes equally among your parents’ descendants (i.e., their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren).
There are further formulas to deal with situations where the individual dies leaving no surviving spouse, children, parents or descendants of parents.
There are some obvious problems with dying intestate:
• Maybe you want your entire estate to pass to your spouse. A “spouse” includes a person married to the deceased and a person who lived common-law with the deceased for at least 2 years. If the value of the spousal home exceeds your spouse’s preferential share of your estate and your spouse can’t afford to pay the difference in value to your children, your spouse may lose the family home.
• Maybe you don’t want that much of your estate to pass to your spouse. Is it a relatively new relationship? Do you your children to receive a larger share?
• If you die leaving minor children and no living parent, the court will need to appoint a guardian without your input.
• A child’s share will be held in trust until they reach the age of 19. The child’s parent or guardian will have to apply to the Public Guardian and Trustee for any money needed for the child’s care, maintenance or benefit, such as living expenses or tuition.
• You lose the ability to set a later age for a child to receive a share of your estate, like 21 or 25 when the child may be more financially responsible or mature.
• Death is stressful enough on a family. Hunting for a will that does not exist adds undue stress.
• An intestate distribution is often more time consuming and costly.
• A court-appointed administrator may sell off items that you otherwise would have kept in the family.
You don’t know when you’re going to die. Every adult who owns assets or has a spouse or young children should have a will. Planning ahead can save your loved ones a great deal of time, stress and money.
See https://www.nixonwenger.com/blog/article/preparing-for-your-estate-planning-meeting.html for more information on estate planning.
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png00NW Adminhttps://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.pngNW Admin2018-05-07 00:00:002021-02-19 00:24:44Dying Without a Will
Andrew represented the widow of a man who died leaving her all his property, which was a very significant amount of land. The Deceased’s siblings sued, arguing that in fact the man had not owned the property, but rather had held in trust for them for decades, following the death of their own parents. They argued that they had transferred their rights in the property to the deceased many years previously, and that a trust resulted from that transfer. At trial, we argued that if there was any transfer at all, it was not one that could be impressed with a trust. We succeeded at trial, and the widow received full ownership of the property at issue.
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png00NW Adminhttps://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.pngNW Admin2018-05-04 00:00:002018-05-04 00:00:00Full ownership of property received
Today we are proud to support BC Kids by wearing our jeans! Lawyers and staff purchased buttons from the BC Children’s Hospital Foundation and raised $225.00!
Funds raised through Jeans Day provide critical support to the programs and services provided by BC Children’s Hospital, Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children and the Research Institute that benefit our kids. Your contribution will support the areas of greatest need in each of these facilities, including specialized research into childhood diseases, the purchase of state-of-the-art medical equipment, and education programs for caregivers and families.
– BC Children’s Hospital Foundation
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png00NW Adminhttps://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.pngNW Admin2018-05-03 00:00:002021-02-19 00:50:31Nixon Wenger #Jeanup for BC Kids
Penner v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations)
We represent Sechelt Community Projects Inc which operates as Sechelt Community Forest (SCF). SCF complied with all regulatory and procedural steps to obtain a cutting permit which allowed them to harvest timber on the lower slopes of Mt. Elphinstone. The Petitioners, Messr’s Muirhead and Penner and Ms. Bloom call themselves Elphinstone Logging Focus and have been trying to have a Provincial Park on Mt. Elphinstone expanded to include areas within SCF’s logging tenure. They are very active in opposing logging in this area. Their opposition has previously been limited to blockades. In this case they decided to attack the legislative authority for logging by saying that the Ministry of Forests District Manager’s decision to grant the cutting permit in question was issued without proper consultation with the community and in particular ELF. They sought to have the cutting permit quashed and an injunction preventing further logging.
ELF was initially successful in obtaining an injunction to prevent logging but when they refused to give an undertaking as to damages as required by the Rules of Court their injunction was lifted and logging continued.
At the hearing we argued that there was no obligation to consult and that the Petitioners could not effectively rewrite the legislation to impose one. Madame Justice Iyer agreed, dismissed the Petition and awarded costs to SCF.
To read the full court decision, click here.
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png00NW Adminhttps://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.pngNW Admin2018-05-01 00:00:002018-05-01 00:00:00Petitioners Seek to Have Logging Cutting Permit Quashed
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
Other cookies
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
Privacy Policy
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.